Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergency Department Management of Transient Ischemic Attack: A Survey of Emergency Physicians.
Oostema, J Adam; Brown, Michael D; Reeves, Mathew.
Afiliação
  • Oostema JA; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Electronic address: oostema@msu.edu.
  • Brown MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
  • Reeves M; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 25(6): 1517-23, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27041082
BACKGROUND: Patients are at high risk for stroke following a transient ischemic attack (TIA). The ideal setting for evaluating and treating patients with TIA has not been established, resulting in variability in emergency department (ED) TIA management. We conducted a survey to describe ED TIA management and factors that influence disposition determination for TIA patients. METHODS: We administered a mail survey to 480 randomly selected members of the Michigan College of Emergency Physicians. Survey questions addressed current ED TIA management, the acceptability of the ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool, and disposition recommendations for a series of hypothetical TIA patients. RESULTS: A total of 188 (39%) responses were received. Head computed tomography (96.2%) and antiplatelet therapy (88.2%) were the most commonly reported ED interventions. Over 85% of respondents reported admitting most or all TIA patients. The ABCD(2) score had low acceptability among emergency medicine physicians and was rarely incorporated into practice (10.7%). Respondents identified a short-term risk of stroke of less than 2% (95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.4) as an acceptable threshold for discharge; however, most respondents recommended admission even for low-risk TIA patients. Those with access to an outpatient TIA clinic were less likely to admit low-risk TIA patients; those with access to an observation unit were more likely to admit. CONCLUSIONS: In this survey, ED physicians preferred hospital admission for most TIA patients, including those at low risk for stroke. The ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool had low acceptability. Further research is needed to refine risk-stratification tools and define the optimal setting for TIA evaluations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Padrões de Prática Médica / Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Médicos Hospitalares / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Padrões de Prática Médica / Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Ataque Isquêmico Transitório / Médicos Hospitalares / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article