Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of short roll C-arm computed tomography and fully automated 3D analysis tools to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Kim, Michael S; Bracken, John; Eshuis, Peter; Chen, S Y James; Fullerton, David; Cleveland, Joseph; Messenger, John C; Carroll, John D.
Afiliação
  • Kim MS; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. michael.kim@ucdenver.edu.
  • Bracken J; Philips Healthcare, Markham, ON, Canada.
  • Eshuis P; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands.
  • Chen SY; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
  • Fullerton D; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
  • Cleveland J; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
  • Messenger JC; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
  • Carroll JD; University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-132, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 32(7): 1145-52, 2016 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091735
Determination of the coplanar view is a critical component of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The safety and accuracy of a novel reduced angular range C-arm computed tomography (CACT) approach coupled with a fully automated 3D analysis tool package to predict the coplanar view in TAVR was evaluated. Fifty-seven patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis deemed prohibitive-risk for surgery and who underwent TAVR were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to CACT vs. angiography (control) in estimating the coplanar view. These approaches to determine the coplanar view were compared quantitatively. Radiation doses needed to determine the coplanar view were recorded for both the CACT and control patients. Use of CACT offered good agreement with the actual angiographic view utilized during TAVR in 34 out of 41 cases in which a CACT scan was performed (83 %). For these 34 cases, the mean angular magnitude difference, taking into account both oblique and cranial/caudal angulation, was 1.3° ± 0.4°, while the maximum difference was 7.3°. There were no significant differences in the mean total radiation dose delivered to patients between the CACT and control groups as measured by either dose area product (207.8 ± 15.2 Gy cm(2) vs. 186.1 ± 25.3 Gy cm(2), P = 0.47) or air kerma (1287.6 ± 117.7 mGy vs. 1098.9 ± 143.8 mGy, P = 0.32). Use of reduced-angular range CACT coupled with fully automated 3D analysis tools is a safe, practical, and feasible method by which to determine the optimal angiographic deployment view for guiding TAVR procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Aortografia / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Radiografia Intervencionista / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Imageamento Tridimensional / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Aortografia / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Radiografia Intervencionista / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Imageamento Tridimensional / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article