Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of monocular vision on the plantar pressure distribution.
Aydin, Elif; Çakmak, Harun; Kocatürk, Tolga; Eroglu, Mürüvvet; Erkan, Erol; Ömürlü, Imran Kurt; Sendur, Ömer Faruk.
Afiliação
  • Aydin E; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: drebulak@yahoo.com.
  • Çakmak H; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Ophtalmology, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: hcakmak@adu.edu.tr.
  • Kocatürk T; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Ophtalmology, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: tkocaturk@adu.edu.tr.
  • Eroglu M; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: mnalbantoglu@yahoo.com.
  • Erkan E; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Ophtalmology, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: erolerkan@gmail.com.
  • Ömürlü IK; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: i.omurlu@gmail.com.
  • Sendur ÖF; Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 09100 Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: ofsendur@yahoo.com.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 35: 23-6, 2016 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27111880
BACKGROUND: Although the influence of monocular vision to upper limb biomechanics has been well documented, data about lower extremity biomechanics are limited. The objective of the present study was to demonstrate pedobarographic differences between both feet of the individuals with monocular vision in static and dynamic conditions. METHODS: Pedobarographic analysis of twenty-four participants with monocular vision was performed. Relative static pressure load (%) and dynamic peak plantar pressure (N/cm(2)), force (N) distributions and contact area percentages (%) were recorded under both low vision and normal vision side foot. FINDINGS: The results showed that relative static pressure loads did not differ between low vision and normal vision foot. Under midfoot of low vision side, a significant increment was found in peak plantar pressures (2.42 (SD 1.09) N/cm(2)) and forces (136.77 (SD 64.96) N) compared to normal vision side foot (1.87 (SD 0.96) N/cm(2); 106.94 (SD 65.03) N). No difference in contact area percentages was detected. INTERPRETATION: These results indicate that there are differences in plantar pressure measurements between feet of individuals with monocular vision. These pedobarographic differences reported here appear to support the assumption that individuals with monocular vision have adaptive gait strategies such as, decreased walking speed, limited ankle motion and postural compensations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Visão Monocular / Baixa Visão / Caminhada / Suporte de Carga / Pé Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Visão Monocular / Baixa Visão / Caminhada / Suporte de Carga / Pé Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article