Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exercise during energy restriction mitigates bone loss but not alterations in estrogen status or metabolic hormones.
Metzger, C E; Baek, K; Swift, S N; De Souza, M J; Bloomfield, S A.
Afiliação
  • Metzger CE; Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
  • Baek K; Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
  • Swift SN; Department of Pharmacology, College of Dentistry and Research of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangwondo, Korea.
  • De Souza MJ; Division of Dietary Supplement Programs, Federal Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Bloomfield SA; Department of Nutrition & Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Osteoporos Int ; 27(9): 2755-2764, 2016 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27129456
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED Energy restriction causes bone loss, increasing stress fracture risk. The impact of exercise during energy restriction on bone and endocrine factors is examined. Exercise with energy restriction did not influence endocrine factors, but did mitigate some bone loss seen with energy restriction in sedentary rats.

INTRODUCTION:

Chronic dietary energy restriction (ER) leads to bone loss and increased fracture risk. Strictly controlled trials of long-term ER with and without vigorous exercise are required to determine whether exercise loading can counterbalance ER-induced bone loss. The aim of this current project is to elucidate the impact of exercise and ER on bone mass, estrogen status, and metabolic hormones.

METHODS:

Twenty-four virgin female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8/group) were divided into three groups-ad libitum fed + exercise (Adlib + EX), 40 % energy restricted + exercise (ER + EX), and 40 % energy restricted + sedentary (ER + SED). Energy availability between ER groups was equal. Treadmill running was performed 4 days/week at 70 % VO2max for 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

Fat and lean mass and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were lower after 12 weeks (p < 0.05) for ER + EX vs Adlib + EX, but ER + EX aBMD was higher than ER + SED (p < 0.0001). Serum leptin and a urinary estrogen metabolite, estrone-1-glucuronide (E1G), were lower at week 12 (p = 0.0002) with ER, with no impact of exercise. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) declined (p = 0.02) from baseline to week 12 in both ER groups. ER + EX exhibited higher cortical volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at the midshaft tibia (p = 0.006) vs ER + SED.

CONCLUSION:

Exercise during ER mitigated some, but not all, of the bone loss observed in sedentary ER rats, but had little impact on changes in urinary E1G and serum IGF-I and leptin. These data highlight the importance of both adequate energy intake and the mechanical loading of exercise in maintaining bone mass.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Condicionamento Físico Animal / Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Densidade Óssea / Restrição Calórica / Estrogênios Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Osteoporos Int Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Condicionamento Físico Animal / Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Densidade Óssea / Restrição Calórica / Estrogênios Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Osteoporos Int Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article