Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase II clinical study of DD-723 (perflubutane): dose-response study in patients with breast tumors.
Miyamoto, Yukio; Ito, Toshikazu; Takada, Etsuo; Omoto, Kiyoka; Hirai, Toshiko; Sekiguchi, Ryuzo; Okuno, Toshitaka; Kanazawa, Shinsaku; Nakata, Norio; Igarashi, Takao.
Afiliação
  • Miyamoto Y; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Jikei University Hospital, 3-19-18 Nishishinbashi, Minato, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan. miyamoto@jikei.ac.jp.
  • Ito T; Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Takada E; Center of Medical Ultrasonics, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Omoto K; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Hirai T; Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara, Japan.
  • Sekiguchi R; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Tochigi Cancer Center, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Okuno T; Kobe Urban Breast Clinic, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Kanazawa S; Department of Radiology, Toho University Omori Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakata N; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Jikei University Hospital, 3-19-18 Nishishinbashi, Minato, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan.
  • Igarashi T; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Jikei University Hospital, 3-19-18 Nishishinbashi, Minato, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan.
J Med Ultrason (2001) ; 39(2): 79-86, 2012 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27278847
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We compared the contrast effect of three doses of DD-723 in subjects with breast tumors to determine the recommended dose. We then evaluated differential diagnosis results using plain ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (plain + enhanced), and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to the pathological diagnosis.

METHODS:

To evaluate the contrast effect, contrast-enhanced ultrasonic images were independently evaluated in a randomized sequence by three blinded reviewers trained in the evaluation method beforehand. Multiple evaluation results from the three reviewers were used to assess the overall contrast effect. The differential diagnosis was evaluated independently by three blinded reviewers using contrast-enhanced ultrasonic images and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images in a randomized sequence; reviewers were also blinded to subject characteristics. Multiple evaluation results from the three reviewers were used to assess the overall differential diagnosis.

RESULTS:

The recommended dose of DD-723 is an intermediate dose of 0.12 µL MB/kg. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were improved more in the differential diagnosis by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography than in plain ultrasonography. Accuracy and specificity were better and sensitivity similar compared to contrast-enhanced MRI.

CONCLUSIONS:

An intermediate dose showed the highest efficacy in terms of overall contrast effect. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is safe and useful when used in differential diagnosis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ultrason (2001) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ultrason (2001) Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article