Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictive value of [18F]-fluoride PET for monitoring bone remodeling in patients with orthopedic conditions treated with a Taylor spatial frame.
Sanchez-Crespo, Alejandro; Christiansson, Frederik; Thur, Charlotte Karlsson; Lundblad, Henrik; Sundin, Anders.
Afiliação
  • Sanchez-Crespo A; Department of Hospital Physics, Nuclear medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. alejandro.sanchez-crespo@karolinska.se.
  • Christiansson F; Karolinska University Hospital, Nuklearmedicin A3:01, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. alejandro.sanchez-crespo@karolinska.se.
  • Thur CK; Department of Radiology, Nyköpings Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.
  • Lundblad H; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Sundin A; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 44(3): 441-448, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27448575
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is used to correct orthopedic conditions such as correction osteotomies in delayed fracture healing and pseudarthrosis. Long-term TSF-treatments are common and may lead to complications. Current conventional radiological methods are often unsatisfactory for therapy monitoring. Hence, an imaging technique capable of quantifying bone healing progression would be advantageous.

METHODS:

A cohort of 24 patients with different orthopedic conditions, pseudarthrosis (n = 10), deformities subjected to correction osteotomy (n = 9), and fracture (n = 5) underwent dynamic [18F]-fluoride (Na18F) PET/CT at 8 weeks and 4 months, respectively, after application of a TSF. Parametric images, corresponding to the net transport rate of [18F]-fluoride from plasma to bone, K i were calculated. The ratio of the maximum K i at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula see text]) as well as the ratio of the maximum Standard Uptake Value at PET scan 2 and 1 ([Formula see text]) were calculated for each individual. Different treatment end-points were scored, and the overall treatment outcome score was compared with the osteoblastic activity progression as scored with [Formula see text] or [Formula see text].

RESULTS:

[Formula see text] and [Formula see text] were not correlated within each orthopedic group (p > 0.1 for all groups), nor for the pooled population (p = 0.12). The distribution of [Formula see text] was found significantly different among the different orthopedic groups (p = 0.0046) -also for [Formula see text] (p = 0.022). The positive and negative treatment predictive values for [Formula see text] were 66.7 % and 77.8 %, respectively. Corresponding values for [Formula see text] were 25 % and 33.3 %

CONCLUSIONS:

The [Formula see text] obtained from dynamic [18F]-fluoride-PET imaging is a promising predictive factor to evaluate changes in bone healing in response to TSF treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pseudoartrose / Remodelação Óssea / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Fraturas Ósseas / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pseudoartrose / Remodelação Óssea / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Fraturas Ósseas / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article