Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimation of the water quality of a large urbanized river as defined by the European WFD: what is the optimal sampling frequency?
Vilmin, Lauriane; Flipo, Nicolas; Escoffier, Nicolas; Groleau, Alexis.
Afiliação
  • Vilmin L; Geosciences Department, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, 35 rue Saint Honoré, 77305, Fontainebleau, France. l.m.vilmin@uu.nl.
  • Flipo N; Department of Earth Sciences - Geochemistry, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80021, 3508TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. l.m.vilmin@uu.nl.
  • Escoffier N; Geosciences Department, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, 35 rue Saint Honoré, 77305, Fontainebleau, France.
  • Groleau A; Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Univ Paris Diderot, UMR 7154 CNRS, 75005, Paris, France.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(24): 23485-23501, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27457554
ABSTRACT
Assessment of the quality of freshwater bodies is essential to determine the impact of human activities on water resources. The water quality status is estimated by comparing indicators with standard thresholds. Indicators are usually statistical criteria that are calculated on discrete measurements of water quality variables. If the time step of the measured time series is not sufficient to fully capture the variable's variability, the deduced indicator may not reflect the system's functioning. The goal of the present work is to assess, through a hydro-biogeochemical modeling approach, the optimal sampling frequency for an accurate estimation of 6 water quality indicators defined by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) in a large human-impacted river, which receives large urban effluents (the Seine River across the Paris urban area). The optimal frequency depends on the sampling location and on the monitored variable. For fast varying compounds that originate from urban effluents, such as PO[Formula see text], NH[Formula see text] and NO[Formula see text], a sampling time step of one week or less is necessary. To be able to reflect the highly transient character of bloom events, chl a concentrations also require a short monitoring time step. On the contrary, for variables that exert high seasonal variability, as NO[Formula see text] and O 2, monthly sampling can be sufficient for an accurate estimation of WFD indicators in locations far enough from major effluents. Integrative water quality variables, such as O 2, can be highly sensitive to hydrological conditions. It would therefore be relevant to assess the quality of water bodies at a seasonal scale rather than at annual or pluri-annual scales. This study points out the possibility to develop smarter monitoring systems by coupling both time adaptative automated monitoring networks and modeling tools used as spatio-temporal interpolators.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Água / Monitoramento Ambiental / Rios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Água / Monitoramento Ambiental / Rios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article