Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical implementation of 3D printing in the construction of patient specific bolus for electron beam radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer.
Canters, Richard A; Lips, Irene M; Wendling, Markus; Kusters, Martijn; van Zeeland, Marianne; Gerritsen, Rianne M; Poortmans, Philip; Verhoef, Cornelia G.
Afiliação
  • Canters RA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Richard.Canters@radboudumc.nl.
  • Lips IM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wendling M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Kusters M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Zeeland M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Gerritsen RM; Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Poortmans P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Verhoef CG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol ; 121(1): 148-153, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27475278
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Creating an individualized tissue equivalent material build-up (i.e. bolus) for electron beam radiation therapy is complex and highly labour-intensive. We implemented a new clinical workflow in which 3D printing technology is used to create the bolus. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A patient-specific bolus is designed in the treatment planning system (TPS) and a shell around it is created in the TPS. The shell is printed and subsequently filled with silicone rubber to make the bolus. Before clinical implementation we performed a planning study with 11 patients to evaluate the difference in tumour coverage between the designed 3D-print bolus and the clinically delivered plan with manually created bolus. For the first 15 clinical patients a second CT scan with the 3D-print bolus was performed to verify the geometrical accuracy.

RESULTS:

The planning study showed that the V85% of the CTV was on average 97% (3D-print) vs 88% (conventional). Geometric comparison of the 3D-print bolus to the originally contoured bolus showed a high similarity (DSC=0.89). The dose distributions on the second CT scan with the 3D print bolus in position showed only small differences in comparison to the original planning CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS:

The implemented workflow is feasible, patient friendly, safe, and results in high quality dose distributions. This new technique increases time efficiency.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article