Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in Chromatin Structure in Curettage Specimens Identifies High-Risk Patients in Endometrial Cancer.
Hveem, Tarjei S; Njølstad, Tormund S; Nielsen, Birgitte; Syvertsen, Rolf Anders; Nesheim, John Arne; Kjæreng, Marna L; Kildal, Wanja; Pradhan, Manohar; Marcickiewicz, Janusz; Tingulstad, Solveig; Staff, Anne C; Haugland, Hans K; Eraker, Runar; Oddenes, Klaus; Rokne, Jan A; Tjugum, Jostein; Lode, Margaret S; Amant, Frederic; Werner, Henrica M J; Bjørge, Line; Albregtsen, Fritz; Liestøl, Knut; Salvesen, Helga B; Trovik, Jone; Danielsen, Håvard E.
Afiliação
  • Hveem TS; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Njølstad TS; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nielsen B; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Syvertsen RA; KG Jebsen Center for Gynecologic Cancer Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Nesheim JA; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Kjæreng ML; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kildal W; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Pradhan M; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Marcickiewicz J; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Tingulstad S; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Staff AC; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Haugland HK; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Eraker R; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Oddenes K; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Rokne JA; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Tjugum J; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lode MS; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Amant F; Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Werner HM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Halland's Hospital Varberg, Varberg, Sweden.
  • Bjørge L; Department of Gynecology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Albregtsen F; Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
  • Liestøl K; Department of Pathology, The Gade Institute, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Salvesen HB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
  • Trovik J; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Danielsen HE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 26(1): 61-67, 2017 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27587790
BACKGROUND: Most endometrial carcinoma patients are diagnosed at an early stage with a good prognosis. However, a relatively low fraction with lethal disease constitutes a substantial number of patients due to the high incidence rate. Preoperative identification of patients with high risk and low risk for poor outcome is necessary to tailor treatment. Nucleotyping refers to characterization of cell nuclei by image cytometry, including the assessment of chromatin structure by nuclear texture analysis. This method is a strong prognostic marker in many cancers but has not been evaluated in preoperative curettage specimens from endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: The prognostic impact of changes in chromatin structure quantified with Nucleotyping was evaluated in preoperative curettage specimens from 791 endometrial carcinoma patients prospectively included in the MoMaTEC multicenter trial. RESULTS: Nucleotyping was an independent prognostic marker of disease-specific survival in preoperative curettage specimens among patients with Federation Internationale des Gynaecologistes et Obstetristes (FIGO) stage I-II disease (HR=2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.5; P = 0.013) and significantly associated with age, FIGO stage, histologic type, histologic grade, myometrial infiltration, lymph node status, curettage histology type, and DNA ploidy. CONCLUSIONS: Nucleotyping in preoperative curettage specimens is an independent prognostic marker for disease-specific survival, with potential to supplement existing parameters for risk stratification to tailor treatment. IMPACT: This is the first study to evaluate the prognostic impact of Nucleotyping in curettage specimens from endometrial carcinoma and shows that this may be a clinically useful prognostic marker in endometrial cancer. External validation is warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 61-67. ©2016 AACR.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA / Cromatina / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA / Cromatina / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article