Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data.
Qazi, Y; Shaffer, D; Kaplan, B; Kim, D Y; Luan, F L; Peddi, V R; Shihab, F; Tomlanovich, S; Yilmaz, S; McCague, K; Patel, D; Mulgaonkar, S.
Afiliação
  • Qazi Y; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Shaffer D; Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Kaplan B; Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Kim DY; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
  • Luan FL; Universtiy of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Peddi VR; Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ.
  • Shihab F; California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
  • Tomlanovich S; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Yilmaz S; University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • McCague K; University Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Patel D; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
  • Mulgaonkar S; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
Am J Transplant ; 17(5): 1358-1369, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27775865
ABSTRACT
In this 12-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, de novo renal transplant recipients (RTxRs) were randomized (11) to receive everolimus plus low-dose tacrolimus (EVR+LTac) or mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose Tac (MMF+STac) with induction therapy (basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin). Noninferiority of composite efficacy failure rate (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection [tBPAR]/graft loss/death/loss to follow-up) in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac was missed by 1.4%, considering the noninferiority margin of 10% (24.6% vs. 20.4%; 4.2% [-3.0, 11.4]). Incidence of tBPAR (19.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher, while graft loss (1.3% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.05) and composite of graft loss/death/lost to follow-up (6.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar between EVR+LTac and MMF+STac groups (63.1 [22.0] vs. 63.1 [19.5] mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and safety was comparable. In conclusion, EVR+LTac missed noninferiority versus MMF+STac based on the 10% noninferiority margin. Further studies evaluating optimal immunosuppression for improved efficacy will guide appropriate dosing and target levels of EVR and LTac in RTxRs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Tacrolimo / Everolimo / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Falência Renal Crônica / Ácido Micofenólico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Tacrolimo / Everolimo / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Falência Renal Crônica / Ácido Micofenólico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article