Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Time Interval between Radiation and Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Mull, Aaron B; Qureshi, Ali A; Zubovic, Ema; Rao, Yuan J; Zoberi, Imran; Sharma, Ketan; Myckatyn, Terence M.
Afiliação
  • Mull AB; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Qureshi AA; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Zubovic E; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Rao YJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Zoberi I; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Sharma K; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Myckatyn TM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 33(2): 130-136, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27798949
ABSTRACT
Background To evaluate whether the timing of surgery after radiation in autologous breast reconstruction affects major complications. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 454 free flaps (331 patients) for breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2003 to 2014. Charts were reviewed for age, BMI, laterality, flap type (TRAM, msTRAM, DIEP), surgeon, donor vessels (IMA, TD), chemotherapy, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, DVT, venous anastomoses, vein size, and time from radiation (none, < 12 months, or ≥ 12 months). The primary outcome of major complications was defined as partial/total flap loss, thrombosis, ischemia, or hematoma requiring return to the operating room. To identify independent predictors of major complications, a multivariate logistic regression was constructed. Alpha = 0.05 indicated significance in all tests. Results Average age was 47.4 ± 8.4. Free flaps consisted of msTRAM (41.1%), TRAM (29.6%), or DIEP (29.3%). The donor vessel was IMA in 66.9% of flaps or TD in 33.0% of patients with 90.7% using only one vein and 9.3% with two veins. The average IMA/TDV size was 2.5 cm ± 0.5. Preoperative radiation occurred in 31.2% of flaps. There were 54 flaps with at least one major complication (11.7%). On multivariate regression, only flap type (OR =4.04, p < .01) and vein size (OR = 0.13, p = 0.02) independently predicted major complications. Conclusion There was no significant difference in major complications between flaps who had reconstruction within 12 months and greater than 12 months after radiation. Only having a more muscle sparing technique or smaller vein size were independent risk factors for major complications.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Reconstr Microsurg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Reconstr Microsurg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article