Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
QSAR Study for Carcinogenic Potency of Aromatic Amines Based on GEP and MLPs.
Song, Fucheng; Zhang, Anling; Liang, Hui; Cui, Lianhua; Li, Wenlian; Si, Hongzong; Duan, Yunbo; Zhai, Honglin.
Afiliação
  • Song F; Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, China. qdsongfucheng@126.com.
  • Zhang A; Modern Educational Technology Center, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China. anling_zhang@126.com.
  • Liang H; Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, China. qdlianghui@126.com.
  • Cui L; Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, China. qdlhcui@163.com.
  • Li W; Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, China. lwenl27@163.com.
  • Si H; Institute for Computational Science and Engineering, Laboratory of New Fibrous Materials and Modern Textile, The Growing Base for State Key Laboratory, Qingdao University, Ningxia Road 308, Qingdao 266071, China. sihz03@126.com.
  • Duan Y; Institute for Computational Science and Engineering, Laboratory of New Fibrous Materials and Modern Textile, The Growing Base for State Key Laboratory, Qingdao University, Ningxia Road 308, Qingdao 266071, China. bobduan@hotmail.com.
  • Zhai H; Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China. zhaihl@163.com.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27854309
A new analysis strategy was used to classify the carcinogenicity of aromatic amines. The physical-chemical parameters are closely related to the carcinogenicity of compounds. Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) is a method of predicting the carcinogenicity of aromatic amine, which can reveal the relationship between carcinogenicity and physical-chemical parameters. This study accessed gene expression programming by APS software, the multilayer perceptrons by Weka software to predict the carcinogenicity of aromatic amines, respectively. All these methods relied on molecular descriptors calculated by CODESSA software and eight molecular descriptors were selected to build function equations. As a remarkable result, the accuracy of gene expression programming in training and test sets are 0.92 and 0.82, the accuracy of multilayer perceptrons in training and test sets are 0.84 and 0.74 respectively. The precision of the gene expression programming is obviously superior to multilayer perceptrons both in training set and test set. The QSAR application in the identification of carcinogenic compounds is a high efficiency method.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Software / Carcinógenos / Aminas / Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos / Mutagênicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Software / Carcinógenos / Aminas / Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos / Mutagênicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article