Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delphi Study to Determine Rehabilitation Research Priorities for Older Adults With Cancer.
Lyons, Kathleen Doyle; Radomski, Mary Vining; Alfano, Catherine M; Finkelstein, Marsha; Sleight, Alix G; Marshall, Timothy F; McKenna, Raymond; Fu, Jack B.
Afiliação
  • Lyons KD; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH. Electronic address: Kathleen.D.Lyons@dartmouth.edu.
  • Radomski MV; Courage Kenny Research Center, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Alfano CM; American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta, GA.
  • Finkelstein M; Courage Kenny Research Center, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Sleight AG; Mrs. T.H. Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Marshall TF; School of Physical Therapy, Kean University, Union, NJ.
  • McKenna R; Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Fu JB; Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(5): 904-914, 2017 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007446
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To solicit expert opinions and develop consensus around the research that is needed to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults.

DESIGN:

Delphi methods provided a structured process to elicit and prioritize research questions from national experts.

SETTING:

National, Web-based survey.

PARTICIPANTS:

Members (N=32) of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine completed at least 1 of 3 investigator-developed surveys.

INTERVENTIONS:

Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

In the first survey, participants identified up to 5 research questions that needed to be answered to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults. In 2 subsequent surveys, participants viewed the compilation of questions, rated the importance of each question, and identified the 5 most important questions. This generated priority scores for each question. Consensus scores were created to describe the degree of agreement around the priority of each question.

RESULTS:

Highest priority research concerns the epidemiology and measurement of function and disability in older adult cancer survivors; the effects of cancer rehabilitation interventions on falls, disability, participation, survival, costs, quality of care, and health care utilization; and testing models of care that facilitate referrals from oncology to rehabilitation providers as part of coordinated, multicomponent care.

CONCLUSIONS:

A multipronged approach is needed to fill these gaps, including targeted funding opportunities developed with an advisory panel of cancer rehabilitation experts, development of a research network to facilitate novel collaborations and grant proposals, and coordinated efforts of clinical groups to advocate for funding, practice change, and policy change.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Pesquisa de Reabilitação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Pesquisa de Reabilitação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article