Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Walking the tightrope-perspectives on local politicians' role in implementing a national social care policy on evidence-based practice.
Bäck, A; Ståhl, C; von Thiele Schwarz, U; Richter, A; Hasson, H.
Afiliação
  • Bäck A; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ; Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, 171 29 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ståhl C; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
  • von Thiele Schwarz U; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Richter A; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ; Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, 171 29 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hasson H; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ; Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, 171 29 Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Ment Health Syst ; 10: 75, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28018481
BACKGROUND: Despite national policy recommending evidence-based practice (EBP), its application in social care has been limited. While local politicians can affect the process, little is known about their knowledge, attitudes and roles regarding EBP. The aim here is twofold: to explore the role of local politicians in the implementation of EBP in social care from both their own and a management perspective; and to examine factors politicians perceive as affecting their decisions and actions concerning the implementation of EBP policy. METHODS: Local politicians (N = 13) and managers (N = 22) in social care were interviewed. Qualitative thematic analysis with both inductive and deductive codes was used. RESULTS: Politicians were rather uninformed regarding EBP and national policy. The factors limiting their actions were, beside the lack of awareness, lack of ability to question existing working methods, and a need for support in the steering of EBP. Thus, personal interest played a significant part in what role the politicians assumed. This resulted in some politicians taking a more active role in steering EBP while others were not involved. From the managers' perspective, a more active steering by politicians was desired. Setting budget and objectives, as well as active follow-up of work processes and outcomes, were identified as means to affect the implementation of EBP. However, the politicians seemed unaware of the facilitating effects of these actions. CONCLUSIONS: Local politicians had a possibility to facilitate the implementation of EBP, but their role was unclear. Personal interest played a big part in determining what role was taken. The results imply that social care politicians might need support in the development of their steering of EBP. Moving the responsibility for EBP facilitation upwards in the political structure could be an important step in developing EBP in social care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ment Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ment Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article