Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast monitoring techniques in CT pulmonary angiography: An important and underappreciated contributor to breast dose.
Mitchell, D P; Rowan, M; Loughman, E; Ridge, C A; MacMahon, P J.
Afiliação
  • Mitchell DP; Department of Radiology, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland. Electronic address: dpmmitchell@gmail.com.
  • Rowan M; Department of Radiology, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland. Electronic address: mrowan@mater.ie.
  • Loughman E; Department of Radiology, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland. Electronic address: eloughman@mater.ie.
  • Ridge CA; Department of Radiology, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland. Electronic address: cridge@mater.ie.
  • MacMahon PJ; Department of Radiology, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland. Electronic address: pmacmahon@mater.ie.
Eur J Radiol ; 86: 184-189, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027745
OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study were to evaluate the contribution of contrast-monitoring techniques to breast dose in pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to investigate the effect of a reduced peak kilovoltage (kV) monitoring scan protocol on breast dose and Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) diagnostic quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single center retrospective study of 221 female patients undergoing a reduced kV 80kV contrast-monitoring CTPA protocol compared to 281 patients using the conventional 120kV contrast-monitoring protocol (Siemens Somatom Definition AS+). 99 pregnant patients analyzed separately. ImPACT dosimetry software was used to calculate dose. Group subsets were evaluated to assess CTPA diagnostic quality. RESULTS: The contrast-monitoring component of a CTPA study constituted 27% of the overall breast dose when using a standard 120kV protocol compared to only 7% of the overall breast dose in the 80kV study group. The dose to the breast from the contrast-monitoring component alone was reduced by 79% in the non-pregnant patients (0.36mGy±0.37 versus 1.7mGy±1.02; p<0.001), and by 88% in the pregnant population (0.25mGy±0.67 versus 2.24mGy±1.61; p<0.001). There was no statistical difference in CTPA diagnostic quality or timing. CONCLUSION: Despite a short scan length and relatively small DLP, contrast-monitoring techniques (test-bolus or bolus-tracked) set at 120kV can account for 27% of the overall breast dose accrued from a CTPA study. By decreasing the kilovoltage of the contrast-monitoring component, a significant reduction in breast dose for pregnant and non-pregnant female patients can be achieved without affecting CTPA quality or timing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez / Embolia Pulmonar / Doses de Radiação / Mama Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez / Embolia Pulmonar / Doses de Radiação / Mama Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article