Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coronal mode ultrasound guided hemodialysis cannulation: A pilot randomized comparison with standard cannulation technique.
Kumbar, Lalathaksha; Soi, Vivek; Adams, Elizabeth; Brown Deacon, Cheryl; Zidan, Mohamed; Yee, Jerry.
Afiliação
  • Kumbar L; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Soi V; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Adams E; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Brown Deacon C; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Zidan M; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Yee J; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Hemodial Int ; 22(1): 23-30, 2018 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067467
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Infiltrations from cannulation result in significant morbidity including loss of hemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA). Cannulation is dependent on personnel skill and VA characteristics. Surface marking of VA lacks real-time information and traditional ultrasound (US) devices are large, expensive, requiring skilled operators. Sonic Window© (Analogic Ultrasound, Peabody, MA, USA) is a coronal mode ultrasound device (CMUD) approved for VA cannulation.

METHODS:

Single center randomized, prospective pilot study comparing handheld US-guided cannulation of new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to standard cannulation practices. Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on in-center HD who had a new AVF cleared for cannulation and dialysis were enrolled. Patients with new AVF received either standard cannulation (control group) or image guidance using CMUD (study group) for 3 weeks. Ultrasound characteristics of VA, cannulation practices and complications end points were obtained.

RESULTS:

An infiltration rate of 9.7% was noted during the study. Slightly lower odds ratio (OR) of infiltration was observed in the study group (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.26-3.41, P value = 0.93). Study group yielded longer time for assessment (101.8 ± 80.2 vs. 22.3 ± 22.5 seconds, P = < 0.001), increased cannulation time (41.1 ± 70.6 vs. 25.0 ± 27.9 seconds, P = 0.04), and increased patient satisfaction (94.6% vs. 82%, P = 0.04) compared to control group. Number of cannulation attempts, needle size, arterial or venous needle insertion, and tourniquet usage between groups were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION:

Handheld ultrasound is a safe and useful aid in cannulation of dialysis access.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Ultrassonografia / Diálise Renal / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hemodial Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Ultrassonografia / Diálise Renal / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hemodial Int Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article