Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and testing of candidate items for inclusion in a new rheumatoid arthritis stiffness patient-reported outcome measure.
Halls, Serena; Dures, Emma; Kirwan, John R; Pollock, Jon; Baker, Gill; Edmunds, Avis; Hewlett, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Halls S; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
  • Dures E; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
  • Kirwan JR; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
  • Pollock J; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
  • Baker G; Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
  • Edmunds A; Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
  • Hewlett S; Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 57(2): 263-272, 2018 02 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28407140
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To qualitatively develop and test a set of candidate items for a new RA stiffness patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that capture the patient perspective. This is an essential first step in PROM development, prior to quantitative development, assessment and validation.

Methods:

Focus groups further examined the previously developed stiffness conceptual model and explored the patient perspective regarding stiffness assessment. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. An iterative process of item development was then performed by the expert study team of researchers, patients and clinicians, based on the two qualitative datasets and informed by measurement theory and guidelines. Finally, these candidate items were tested using formal cognitive interview methodology and subsequently refined.

Results:

Sixteen RA patients from the UK participated in focus groups. Data confirmed the conceptual model of the RA patient experience of stiffness and provided insight into stiffness assessment, including suggestions regarding patient-relevant stiffness assessment categories such as impact, location and timing. These data informed the development of 77 candidate stiffness PROM items, including multiple formats for some. Eleven RA patients participated in cognitive interviews. Minor changes were made to items to enhance understanding and 32 items were removed, resulting in 45 candidate PROM items.

Conclusion:

Rigorous qualitative methodology and considerable patient involvement has underpinned items for a new RA stiffness PROM with strong content validity. Crucially, patient involvement broadened assessment beyond early morning stiffness duration, which may address existing PROM limitations. Items are now suitable for quantitative item reduction, structural development of the final PROM and validation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Avaliação da Deficiência / Autoavaliação Diagnóstica / Avaliação de Sintomas / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Avaliação da Deficiência / Autoavaliação Diagnóstica / Avaliação de Sintomas / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article