Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review.
Hoppenbrouwers, Tamara; Autar, Anouchska S A; Sultan, Andi R; Abraham, Tsion E; van Cappellen, Wiggert A; Houtsmuller, Adriaan B; van Wamel, Willem J B; van Beusekom, Heleen M M; van Neck, Johan W; de Maat, Moniek P M.
Afiliação
  • Hoppenbrouwers T; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Autar ASA; Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Sultan AR; Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Abraham TE; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Cappellen WA; Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Houtsmuller AB; Optical Imaging Center, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Wamel WJB; Optical Imaging Center, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Beusekom HMM; Optical Imaging Center, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Neck JW; Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Maat MPM; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One ; 12(5): e0176472, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486563
BACKGROUND: Multiple inducers of in vitro Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation (NETosis) have been described. Since there is much variation in study design and results, our aim was to create a systematic review of NETosis inducers and perform a standardized in vitro study of NETosis inducers important in (cardiac) wound healing. METHODS: In vitro NETosis was studied by incubating neutrophils with PMA, living and dead bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli), LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant), glucose and calcium ionophore Ionomycin using 3-hour periods of time-lapse confocal imaging. RESULTS: PMA is a consistent and potent inducer of NETosis. Ionomycin also consistently resulted in extrusion of DNA, albeit with a process that differs from the NETosis process induced by PMA. In our standardized experiments, living bacteria were also potent inducers of NETosis, but dead bacteria, LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant) and glucose did not induce NETosis. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review confirms that there is much variation in study design and results of NETosis induction. Our experimental results confirm that under standardized conditions, PMA, living bacteria and Ionomycin all strongly induce NETosis, but real-time confocal imaging reveal different courses of events.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Armadilhas Extracelulares Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Armadilhas Extracelulares Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article