Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prenatal ultrasound parameters in single-suture craniosynostosis.
Cornelissen, Martijn J; Apon, Inge; van der Meulen, Jacques J N M; Groenenberg, Irene A L; Kraan-van der Est, Mieke N; Mathijssen, Irene M J; Bonsel, Gouke J; Cohen-Overbeek, Titia E.
Afiliação
  • Cornelissen MJ; a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Apon I; a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • van der Meulen JJNM; a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Groenenberg IAL; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Kraan-van der Est MN; c Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Mathijssen IMJ; a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Handsurgery , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Bonsel GJ; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • Cohen-Overbeek TE; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine , Erasmus MC , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(15): 2050-2057, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553772
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Although single-suture craniosynostosis is diagnosed sporadically during pregnancy, timely referral is critical for its treatment. Additionally, craniosynostosis leads to increased maternofetal trauma during birth. In the Netherlands, 95% of pregnant women receive a standard ultrasound at around 20 weeks of gestation, potentially an ideal setting for detecting craniosynostosis prenatally. To enhance the prenatal detection of the metopic and the sagittal suture synostosis, we wished to identify new screening parameters. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed data of the 20-week anomaly scan in trigonocephaly patients (n = 41), scaphocephaly patients (n = 41), and matched controls (n = 82). We measured six different cranial dimensions, including head circumference, biparietal diameter, and occipito-frontal diameter, defining the cephalic index as the ratio between biparietal and occipito-frontal diameter.

RESULTS:

Prenatal biometric measurements did not differ significantly between trigonocephaly patients and controls. Although significantly lower in scaphocephaly patients (0.76 versus 0.79; p = .000), the cephalic index by itself is not appropriate for screening at 20 weeks of gestation. Longitudinal analysis suggests that a deflection in BPD curve is found in scaphocephaly patients, starting at 20 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prenatal biometric measurements do not differ significantly between trigonocephaly patients and controls. The CI is lower in scaphocephaly patients. A deflection in BPD curve should be followed by 3 D imaging of the cranial sutures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Craniossinostoses Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Craniossinostoses Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article