Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases.
Reynolds, Margaret M; Arnett, Andrea L; Parney, Ian F; Kumar, Ravi; Laack, Nadia N; Maloney, Patrick R; Kozelsky, Timothy F; Garces, Yolanda I; Foote, Robert L; Pulido, Jose S.
Afiliação
  • Reynolds MM; Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
  • Arnett AL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Parney IF; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Kumar R; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Laack NN; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Maloney PR; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Kozelsky TF; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Garces YI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Foote RL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  • Pulido JS; Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560050
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS:

Eleven patients (11 eyes) had UM while seven patients (7 eyes) had intraocular metastases. Patients with UM were followed for a median of 19.74 ± 10.4 months. Visual acuity (VA) logMAR 0.30 ± 0.53 (Snellen 20/40) versus 0.40 ± 0.97 (Snellen 20/50), tumor thickness (5.30 ± 2.17 vs. 3.60 ± 2.32 mm), were not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative measurements, respectively. Nine percent (1/11) patients required enucleation. Subsequently, no patients experienced metastases. Patients with intraocular metastases were followed for a median of 6.03 ± 6.32 months. They did not have significant changes in VA (logMAR 0.30 ± 0.59 vs. 0.30 ± 1.57; Snellen 20/40 vs. 20/40) or tumor thickness (3.50 ± 1.36 vs. 1.30 ± 0.76 mm) postoperatively. Fourteen percent (1/7 patients) required enucleation. Complications experienced by patients with UM include radiation retinopathy (2/11), papillopathy (1/11), cystoid macular edema (1/11), vitreomacular traction (1/11), exudative retinal detachment (1/11). Patients with metastases had treatment complicated by recurrence (2/7). Dose to the margin, maximum dose of radiation, and clinical target volume did not correlate with post-procedural VA, risk of enucleation, or death in patients with either UM or patients with intraocular metastases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Visual outcomes were satisfactory for patients undergoing GKR without significant morbidity and without significant risk of enucleation or metastases.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Retina Vitreous Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Retina Vitreous Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article