Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CSF biomarkers in delirium: a systematic review.
Hall, Roanna J; Watne, Leiv Otto; Cunningham, Emma; Zetterberg, Henrik; Shenkin, Susan D; Wyller, Torgeir Bruun; MacLullich, Alasdair M J.
Afiliação
  • Hall RJ; Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Watne LO; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Cunningham E; Oslo Delirium Research Group, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Zetterberg H; Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Shenkin SD; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.
  • Wyller TB; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
  • MacLullich AMJ; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 33(11): 1479-1500, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28585290
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In recent years, there has been a blossoming of studies examining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a method of studying the pathophysiology of delirium. We systematically reviewed the literature for CSF studies in delirium and provide here a summary of the implications for our understanding of delirium pathophysiology. We also summarise the methods used for CSF analysis and discuss challenges and implications for future studies.

METHODS:

In this systematic review, we screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Library for articles on CSF biomarkers in delirium, published on 3 September 2016. Studies were required to use Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases criteria for delirium or a validated tool. We excluded case reports. There were no other restrictions on study type.

RESULTS:

We identified 3280 articles from our initial search, and 22 articles were included in this review. All studies were prospective, including over 400 patients with delirium and 700 controls. More than 70 different biomarkers were studied. Studies could not be compared with each other for meta-analysis because of their heterogeneity and varied widely in their risk of bias and quality assessments.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 22 studies identified in this review reveal a small but growing literature, in which many of the important hypotheses in delirium pathogenesis have been examined, but from which few firm conclusions can currently be drawn. Nevertheless, the overall interpretation of the literature supports the vulnerable brain concept, that is, that biomarker evidence of, for example, Alzheimer's disease pathology and/or neuroinflammation, is associated with delirium.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Delírio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Delírio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article