Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Ebola infection prevention and control in primary healthcare facilities in Sierra Leone: a single-group pretest post-test, mixed-methods study.
Ratnayake, Ruwan; Ho, Lara S; Ansumana, Rashid; Brown, Hannah; Borchert, Matthias; Miller, Laura; Kratz, Thomas; McMahon, Shannon A; Sahr, Foday.
Afiliação
  • Ratnayake R; Health Unit, International Rescue Committee, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ho LS; Health Unit, International Rescue Committee, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Ansumana R; Mercy Hospital Research Laboratory, Kulanda Town, Bo, Sierra Leone.
  • Brown H; Anthropology Department, Durham University, Durham, UK.
  • Borchert M; Institute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Miller L; International Rescue Committee, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  • Kratz T; Information Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
  • McMahon SA; Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sahr F; Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
BMJ Glob Health ; 1(4): e000103, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28588978
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accomplishing infection prevention and control (IPC) in health facilities in Sub-Saharan Africa is challenging. Owing to poor IPC, healthcare workers (HCWs) were frequently infected during Sierra Leone's Ebola epidemic. In late 2014, IPC was rapidly and nationally scaled up. We carried out workshops in sampled facilities to further improve adherence to IPC. We investigated HCW experiences and observed practice gaps, before and after the workshops.

METHODS:

We conducted an uncontrolled, before and after, mixed-methods study in eight health facilities in Bo and Kenema Districts during December 2014 and January 2015. Quantitative methods administered to HCWs at baseline and follow-up included a survey on attitudes and self-efficacy towards IPC, and structured observations of behaviours. The intervention involved a workshop for HCWs to develop improvement plans for their facility. We analysed the changes between rounds in survey responses and behaviours. We used interviews to explore attitudes and self-efficacy throughout the study period.

RESULTS:

HCWs described IPC as 'life-saving' and personal protective equipment (PPE) as uncomfortable for providers and frightening for patients. At baseline, self-efficacy was high (median=4/strongly agree). Responses reflecting unfavourable attitudes were low for glove use (median=1/strongly disagree, IQR, 1-2) and PPE use with ill family members (median=1, IQR, 1-2), and mixed for PPE use with ill HCWs (median=2/disagree, IQR, 1-4). Observations demonstrated consistent glove reuse and poor HCW handwashing. The maintenance of distance (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) and patient handwashing (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.25) improved to >90%.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found favourable attitudes towards IPC and gaps in practice. Risk perceptions of HCWs and tendencies to ration PPE where chronic supply chain issues normally lead to PPE stock-outs may affect practice. As Sierra Leone's Ebola Recovery Strategy aims to make all facilities IPC compliant, socio-behavioural improvements and a secure supply chain are essential.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article