Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biological and Behavioral Factors Associated With Positive Chlamydia Retests.
Smith, Kirsty S; Guy, Rebecca; Danielewski, Jennifer; Tabrizi, Sepehr N; Fairley, Christopher K; McNulty, Anna M; Rawlinson, William; Saville, Marion; Garland, Suzanne M; Donovan, Basil; Kaldor, John M; Hocking, Jane S.
Afiliação
  • Smith KS; From the *Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney; †Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; ‡Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital; §Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne; ¶Melbourne Sexual Health Centre; ∥Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; **Sydney Sexual Health Centre; ††School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Australia; ‡‡Serology and Virology Division, (SAViD) SEALS Microbiology, Prince of Wal
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(7): 417-422, 2017 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608791
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Repeat chlamydia detection after treatment is common, and there is concern that treatment failure may be a cause.

METHODS:

Within a randomized trial, we established a prospective cohort of 600 participants with anogenital chlamydia diagnoses (200 each of women, heterosexual men, and men who have sex with men [MSM]). Participants were invited for repeat testing at 3 months and to complete a behavioral survey at 4 months. Positive samples were analyzed for organism DNA load and genovar. We estimated repeat chlamydia positivity, reinfection and treatment failure rates, and investigated the biological and behavioral factors associated with a repeat positive test.

RESULTS:

A total of 290 participants (100 women, 89 heterosexual men, 101 MSM) were retested at 1 to 4 months, with 43 repeat positives, including 26 classed as reinfection and 9 as treatment failures. Comparing MSM with heterosexual men and women combined, repeat positivity was higher (20.8% vs 11.6%, P = 0.04), and treatment failure was higher (6.9% vs 1.1%, P = 0.01), but there was no difference in reinfection rates (11.9% vs 7.4%, P = 0.21). Among MSM, the odds of repeat positivity increased by 90% with each additional log organism load in the original specimen (baseline) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.2). Among heterosexuals, the odds of repeat positivity decreased by 10% with each additional week delay in being retested for chlamydia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS:

Positive retests were more common among MSM than heterosexuals. Treatment failure was more common in MSM with rectal chlamydia, reinforcing concerns about azithromycin treatment failure.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Chlamydia trachomatis / Cooperação do Paciente / Homossexualidade Masculina / Heterossexualidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Sex Transm Dis Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Chlamydia trachomatis / Cooperação do Paciente / Homossexualidade Masculina / Heterossexualidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Sex Transm Dis Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article