Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unexpected Seed Migration in Prostate Brachytherapy Implants Coincident with Change in Seed Stranding Product.
Rose, Jim; Liu, Derek; Boychak, Oleksandr; Sloboda, Ron; Pervez, Nadeem; Murtha, Albert; Yee, Don; Amanie, John; Usmani, Nawaid.
Afiliação
  • Rose J; Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Abbotsford Centre.
  • Liu D; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Boychak O; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Sloboda R; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Pervez N; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Murtha A; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Yee D; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Amanie J; Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta.
  • Usmani N; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta.
Cureus ; 9(5): e1243, 2017 May 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28620572
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine if significant seed migration occurred when our institution changed seed products by comparing patterns of seed migration in implants containing different stranding material. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Day 0 and Day 30 CT scans were registered by the contoured prostate center of mass. An implant reconstruction program identified seeds on CT according to the pre-plan, enabling one-to-one correspondence between Day 0 and Day 30 seeds. Significant seed migration was defined by review of seeds that migrated > 2 cm outside the prostate or appearance in unexpected locations.   Results: Twenty-five (149, 16.8%) new strands displayed movement > 2 cm between Day 0 and Day 30 compared with just 2/118 (1.7%) of the standard strands. Six out of 26 (23%) patients with new strands displayed significant migration compared with 2/13 (14%) of patients with standard strands. In the six patients with new strands and significant migration, a mean of four strands (17%, range: 2-8 per patient) migrated significantly with 65% due to whole strand migration, 25% due to strand breakage, and 10% strand clumping. In the control group, only two strands (2%) migrated significantly, both due to strand breakage. Despite the greater seed movement with the new strands, Day 0 and Day 30 dosimetry was acceptable. CONCLUSION: In this short report, we identified that a change to a new strand type was associated with unexpected significant seed movement compared to our typical strands. Since seed movement can arise from unexpected causes, it is important to maintain quality assurance practices when a change in technique or infrastructure is instituted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article