Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three single loops enhance the biomechanical behavior of the transtibial pull-out technique for posterior meniscal root repair.
Camarda, Lawrence; Pitarresi, Giuseppe; Lauria, Michele; Fazzari, Federico; D'Arienzo, Michele.
Afiliação
  • Camarda L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy. lawrence.camarda@unipa.it.
  • Pitarresi G; Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Gestionale, Informatica e Meccanica (DICGIM), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo, Italy.
  • Lauria M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy.
  • Fazzari F; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy.
  • D'Arienzo M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 137(9): 1301-1306, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28674738
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the effect of applying an additional suture to enhance the biomechanical behavior of the suture-meniscus construct used during the transtibial pull-out repair technique.

METHODS:

A total of 20 fresh-frozen porcine tibiae with intact medial menisci were used. In one half of all specimens (N = 10), two non-absorbable sutures were passed directly over the meniscal root from the tibia side of the meniscus to the femoral side (2SS). In other ten specimens, three sutures were passed over the meniscal root (3SS). All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing. Displacement of the construct was recorded at 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Further, stiffness (500-1000 cycles) and ultimate load and modes of failure of the suture-meniscus construct were also recorded.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant difference between the Group 2SS and Group 3SS at the 1st (1.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.4 ± 0.4 mm) and the 100th cycle (2 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0.4 mm). At 500 and 1000 cycles, the 2SS fixation technique resulted in significantly more displacement than the 3SS fixation technique (2.8 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm; 3.1 ± 0.7 vs 2.5 ± 0.5 mm) (p < 0.05). No differences between two groups were noted concerning ultimate load to failure and stiffness (500-1000 cycles).

CONCLUSION:

Three single sutures technique provided superior biomechanical properties compared with the two single sutures technique during the conducted fatigue tests. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Applying three simple stitches during meniscal root repair might be beneficial for healing of the posterior meniscal root, potentially reducing the post-operative immobilization time.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Fenômenos Biomecânicos / Meniscos Tibiais / Técnicas de Sutura / Artroplastia do Joelho Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Fenômenos Biomecânicos / Meniscos Tibiais / Técnicas de Sutura / Artroplastia do Joelho Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article