Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fair hearing outcomes of patients recommended discharge from methadone maintenance.
Chang, Jamie Suki; Chiu, Joshua D; Gruber, Valerie A; Sorensen, James L.
Afiliação
  • Chang JS; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States. Electronic address: Jamie.chang@ucsf.edu.
  • Chiu JD; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States.
  • Gruber VA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States. Electronic address: Valerie.gruber@ucsf.edu.
  • Sorensen JL; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, United States. Electronic address: James.sorensen@ucsf.edu.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 83: 68-72, 2017 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28919058
ABSTRACT
A system known as fair hearings is a due process opportunity for patients who are involuntarily discharged from methadone maintenance treatment to challenge the discharge recommendation. We know very little about the processes and outcomes of fair hearings. For this study, we used a mixed methods approach to retrospectively analyze 73 fair hearing reports that were documented from a California methadone maintenance treatment program between 2000 and 2014. The aims of the study were to identify the reasons for involuntary discharge recommendation from methadone maintenance, describe the factors involved when fair hearing outcomes decided in favor of the clinic, and describe the factors involved when fair hearing outcomes decided in favor of the patient. We found that patient attendance at the fair hearing meeting was significantly related to the outcome ruling in favor of the patient. We organized the reasons for discharge recommendations into five categories 1) suspected diversion, 2) behavioral/interpersonal, 3) repeated, unexcused absences, 4) co-occurring substance use, and 5) multiple sources of opioids. For each category, we use excerpts from fair hearing reports to provide context to the circumstances involved in an outcome favoring the patient or the clinic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 / 8_ODS3_consumo_sustancias_psicoactivas Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Cooperação do Paciente / Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias / Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos / Analgésicos Opioides / Metadona Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Subst Abuse Treat Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 / 8_ODS3_consumo_sustancias_psicoactivas Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Cooperação do Paciente / Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de Substâncias / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias / Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos / Analgésicos Opioides / Metadona Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Subst Abuse Treat Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article