Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Kinematic characterization of clinically observed aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional study.
Wattananon, Peemongkon; Ebaugh, David; Biely, Scott A; Smith, Susan S; Hicks, Gregory E; Silfies, Sheri P.
Afiliação
  • Wattananon P; Motor Control and Neural Plasticity Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. peemongkon.wat@mahidol.ac.th.
  • Ebaugh D; Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences Department, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA.
  • Biely SA; Physical Therapy Program, Neumann University, One Neumann Drive, Aston, PA, 1901, USA.
  • Smith SS; College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 245 N 15th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA.
  • Hicks GE; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 S. College Ave, Suite 210E, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
  • Silfies SP; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 S. College Ave, Suite 210E, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 455, 2017 Nov 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29141615
BACKGROUND: Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns during active forward bending is one criterion used to identify patients with non-specific low back pain suspected to have movement coordination impairment. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify kinematic patterns of the pelvis and trunk using a dynamics systems approach, and determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic classification. METHOD: Ninety-eight subjects performed repeated forward bending with clinical observation and kinematic data simultaneously collected. Kinematic data were plotted using angle-angle, coupling-angle, and phase-plane diagrams. Accuracy statistics in conjunction with receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic patterns. RESULTS: Kinematic patterns were consistent with clinical observation and definitions of typical and aberrant movement patterns with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.46-0.50; PABAK = 0.49-0.73). Early pelvic motion dominance in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagram ≥59° within the first 38% of the movement represent observed altered lumbopelvic rhythm. Frequent disruptions in lumbar spine velocity represented by phase-plane diagrams with local minimum occurrences ≥6 and sudden decoupling in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagrams with sum of local minimum and maximum occurrences ≥15 represent observed judder. CONCLUSION: These findings further define observations of movement coordination between the pelvis and lumbar spine for the presence of altered lumbopelvic rhythm and judder. Movement quality of the lumbar spine segment is key to identifying judder. This information will help clinicians better understand and identify aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article