Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gender Representation in Urologic Subspecialties.
Nettey, Oluwarotimi S; Fuchs, Joceline S; Kielb, Stephanie J; Schaeffer, Edward M.
Afiliação
  • Nettey OS; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Fuchs JS; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Kielb SJ; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Schaeffer EM; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: e-schaeffer@northwestern.edu.
Urology ; 114: 66-70, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331304
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine associations between urologic subspecialization, surgeon gender and practice patterns among certifying urologists over the last 13 years. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Demographic data of certifying and recertifying urologists (2004 to 2015) were obtained from the American Board of Urology. We investigated gender-specific trends in self-reported practice type (academic practice, private practice), subspecialization, and employment as a full-time vs part-time physician, relative to certification year and cycle.

RESULTS:

Of 9140 urologists applying for certification or recertification over the study period, 815 (8.9%) were women. The largest proportion of female surgeon candidates (65.0%) was first-time certifiers. Women represented 16.7% of first-time certifying urologists (P < .001) and reported practicing in academia more frequently (23.6%) compared with 13.7% of men (P < .001). Female surgeons identified as subspecialists in greater numbers (46.4%) than their male counterparts (23.4%) across all certification years and cycle cohorts (P < .001). Women reported subspecializing in female urology (24.2%) and pediatrics (10.2%) at higher frequencies than their male colleagues (4.6% and 3.1% respectively, both P < .001). Female and male surgeon candidates requested certification in equal proportion in andrology and infertility (P = .83) and endourology (3.6% female vs 5.8% male, P = .13), however differed in oncology (4.2% female vs 7.2% male, P = .001).

CONCLUSION:

A growing proportion of certifying urologists are women, with the greatest enrichment among those seeking first-time certification. Since 2004, female surgeons account for a disproportionate volume of urologists who practice in the academic setting and identify as subspecialists.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Urologia / Certificação Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Urologia / Certificação Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article