Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Preferences for Managing Insomnia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Cheung, Janet M Y; Bartlett, Delwyn J; Armour, Carol L; Saini, Bandana; Laba, Tracey-Lea.
Afiliação
  • Cheung JMY; Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. janet.cheung@sydney.edu.au.
  • Bartlett DJ; CIRUS, Centre for Integrated Research and Understanding of Sleep, The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. janet.cheung@sydney.edu.au.
  • Armour CL; CIRUS, Centre for Integrated Research and Understanding of Sleep, The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Saini B; Clinical Management Group, The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Laba TL; Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Patient ; 11(5): 503-514, 2018 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29502237
BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid development of effective treatments, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, insomnia management remains suboptimal at the practice interface. Patient preferences play a critical role in influencing treatment outcomes. However, there is currently a mismatch between patient preferences and clinician recommendations, partly perpetuated by a limited understanding of the patients' decision-making process. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to empirically quantify patient preferences for treatment attributes common to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological insomnia treatments. METHOD: An efficient dual-response discrete choice experiment was conducted to evaluate patient treatment preferences for managing insomnia. The sample included 205 patients with self-reported insomnia and an Insomnia Severity Index ≥ 14. Participants were presented with two unlabelled hypothetical scenarios with an opt-out option across 12 choice sets. Data were analyzed using a mixed multinomial logit model to investigate the influence of five attributes (i.e. time, onset of action, maintainability of improved sleep, length of treatment, and monthly cost) on treatment preferences. RESULTS: Treatments were preferentially viewed if they conferred long-term sleep benefits (p < 0.05); had an ongoing, as opposed to a predefined, duration of treatment course (p < 0.05); required some, as opposed to no, additional time commitment (p < 0.05); and had lower monthly out-of-pocket treatment costs (p < 0.001). However, treatment onset of action had no influence on preference. Age, help-seeking status, concession card status and fatigue severity significantly influenced treatment preference. CONCLUSION: Participants' prioritization of investing time in treatment and valuing the maintainability of therapeutic gains suggests a stronger inclination towards non-pharmacological treatment, defying current assumptions that patients prefer 'quick-fixes' for managing insomnia.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento de Escolha / Tomada de Decisões / Preferência do Paciente / Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Patient Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento de Escolha / Tomada de Decisões / Preferência do Paciente / Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Patient Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article