Manometric and ultrasonographic characteristics of patients with coexisting fecal incontinence and constipation.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) depends upon the dominant pathophysiology impaired sphincter contractility or overflow due to pelvic floor dyssynergia and insufficient rectal emptying. In this study, we aimed to define the manometric and anorectal ultrasound characteristics in FI patients with and without constipation. METHODS: We did a retrospective study of 365 anal manometries, performed between October 2012 and July 2015, in patients with FI. Clinical information was obtained from questionnaires. In 220 of these patients an anorectal ultrasound was also available. Key results: A high prevalence of self-reported constipation was seen in the total population of FI patients (66%). This number was lower (31%) when Rome IV criteria were applied. A very high percentage of manometric pelvic floor dyssynergia was seen in the total population with FI (81%). However, patients with FI and constipation did not show pelvic floor dyssynergia more often than patients without constipation. Anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure and anorectal pressure sensitivity were not different when comparing patients without and with constipation. The prevalence of a functional defecation disorder (FDD) in our study population of FI patients was 20%. Wexner score in this subgroup was lower compared with patients without FDD. Anal sphincter defects were more prevalent in women than men, and were associated with diminished sphincter contractility. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES A very high percentage of FI patients showed manometric pelvic floor dyssynergia. The coexistence of fecal incontinence and constipation did not increase this percentage. KEY MESSAGES Constipation is a frequent and underestimated cause of FI. A correct diagnosis has a major impact on treatment. We aimed to characterize the manometric and transrectal ultrasound profile of FI patients with and without signs of coexisting constipation. - A very high percentage of incontinent patients showed pelvic floor dyssynergia, however no significant difference between the group with and the group without constipation was seen. Anal resting pressure, squeeze pressure and anorectal pressure sensitivity did not differ significantly either.