Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Viral load and antibody boosting following herpes zoster diagnosis.
Warren-Gash, Charlotte; Forbes, Harriet; Maple, Peter; Quinlivan, Mark; Breuer, Judith.
Afiliação
  • Warren-Gash C; Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: charlotte.warren-gash1@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Forbes H; Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Maple P; Virus Reference Department, Health Protection Agency (now Public Health England) Centre for Infections, Colindale, London, UK; Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
  • Quinlivan M; Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
  • Breuer J; Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
J Clin Virol ; 103: 12-15, 2018 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29602095
BACKGROUND: Acute varicella zoster virus (VZV) replication in shingles is accompanied by VZV antibody boosting. It is unclear whether persisting virus shedding affects antibody levels. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between VZV viral load and antibody titres in shingles patients during six months following diagnosis and assess whether VZV antibody titre could discriminate patients with recent shingles from healthy population controls. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of 63 patients with active zoster. Blood samples were collected at baseline, one, three and six months to measure VZV DNA and IgG antibody titre. We compared VZV antibody titres of zoster patients and 441 controls. RESULTS: In acute zoster, viral load was highest at baseline and declined gradually over the following six months. Mean antibody titres rose fourfold, peaking at one month and remaining above baseline levels throughout the study. Antibody levels at one, three and six months after zoster were moderately correlated with baseline but not subsequent viral load. Regarding use of antibody titres to identify recent shingles, to achieve 80% sensitivity, specificity would be 23.4%, 67.7%, 64.8% and 52.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively, whilst to achieve 80% specificity, sensitivity would be 28.3%, 66.1%, 52.6%, 38.6%, at baseline, visit 2, 3 and 4 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical VZV reactivation boosted VZV antibody levels and the level of boosting was dependent upon baseline viral replication. While antibody titres could discriminate patients with shingles 1-6 months earlier from blood donor controls, there was a large trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA Viral / Imunoensaio / Carga Viral / Herpes Zoster / Anticorpos Antivirais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA Viral / Imunoensaio / Carga Viral / Herpes Zoster / Anticorpos Antivirais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Virol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article