Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis.
Thakar, Chrishan; Kieser, David Christopher; Mardare, Mihai; Haleem, Shahnawaz; Fairbank, Jeremy; Nnadi, Colin.
Afiliação
  • Thakar C; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxfordshire, England, UK.
  • Kieser DC; Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. kieserdavid@gmail.com.
  • Mardare M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Canterbury District Health Board, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand. kieserdavid@gmail.com.
  • Haleem S; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxfordshire, England, UK.
  • Fairbank J; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxfordshire, England, UK.
  • Nnadi C; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxfordshire, England, UK.
Eur Spine J ; 27(9): 2062-2071, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29675673
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To analyse the complication profile of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in early onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS:

This is a systematic review using PUBMED, Medline, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library (keywords MAGEC, Magnetically controlled growing rods and EOS) of all studies written in English with a minimum of five patients and a 1-year follow-up. We evaluated coronal correction, growth progression (T1-S1, T1-T12) and complications.

RESULTS:

Fifteen studies (336 patients) were included (42.5% male, mean age 7.9 years, average follow-up 29.7 months). Coronal improvement was achieved in all studies (pre-operative 64.8°, latest follow-up 34.9° p = 0.000), as was growth progression (p = 0.001). Mean complication rate was 44.5%, excluding the 50.8% medical complication rate. The unplanned revision rate was 33%. The most common complications were anchor pull-out (11.8%), implant failure (11.7%) and rod breakage (10.6%). There was no significant difference between primary (39.8%) and conversion (33.3%) procedures (p = 0.462). There was a non-statistically significant increased complication rate with single rods (40 vs. 27% p = 0.588).

CONCLUSIONS:

MCGRs improve coronal deformity and maintain spinal growth, but carry a 44.5% complication and 33% unplanned revision rate. Conversion procedures do not increase this risk. Single rods should be avoided. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aparelhos Ortopédicos / Próteses e Implantes / Escoliose / Imãs Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aparelhos Ortopédicos / Próteses e Implantes / Escoliose / Imãs Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article