Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Effects of Transforming Growth Factor ß1 on Microglia From Rat and Mouse: Transcriptional Profiles and Potassium Channels.
Lively, Starlee; Lam, Doris; Wong, Raymond; Schlichter, Lyanne C.
Afiliação
  • Lively S; Krembil Research Institute, Genes and Development Division, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lam D; Krembil Research Institute, Genes and Development Division, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Wong R; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Schlichter LC; Krembil Research Institute, Genes and Development Division, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Cell Neurosci ; 12: 115, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29780305
The cytokine, transforming growth factor ß1 (TGFß1), is up-regulated after central nervous system (CNS) injuries or diseases involving microglial activation, and it has been proposed as a therapeutic agent for treating neuroinflammation. Microglia can produce and respond to TGFß1. While rats and mice are commonly used for studying neuroinflammation, very few reports directly compare them. Such studies are important for improving pre-clinical studies and furthering translational progress in developing therapeutic interventions. After intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the rat striatum, the TGFß1 receptor was highly expressed on microglia/macrophages within the hematoma. We recently found species similarities and differences in response to either a pro-inflammatory (interferon-γ, IFN-γ, +tumor necrosis factor, TNF-α) or anti-inflammatory interleukin-4 (IL-4) stimulus. Here, we assessed whether rat and mouse microglia differ in their responses to TGFß1. Microglia were isolated from Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice and treated with TGFß1. We quantified changes in expression of >50 genes, in their morphology, proliferation, apoptosis and in three potassium channels that are considered therapeutic targets. Many inflammatory mediators, immune receptors and modulators showed species similarities, but notable differences included that, for some genes, only one species responded (e.g., Il4r, Il10, Tgfbr2, colony-stimulating factor receptor (Csf1r), Itgam, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (Socs1), toll-like receptors 4 (Tlr4), P2rx7, P2ry12), and opposite responses were seen for others (Tgfb1, Myc, Ifngr1). In rat only, TGFß1 affected microglial morphology and proliferation, but there was no apoptosis in either species. In both species, TGFß1 dramatically increased Kv1.3 channel expression and current (no effects on Kir2.1). KCa3.1 showed opposite species responses: the current was low in unstimulated rat microglia and greatly increased by TGFß1 but higher in control mouse cells and decreased by TGFß1. Finally, we compared TGFß1 and IL10 (often considered similar anti-inflammatory stimuli) and found many different responses in both species. Overall, the numerous species differences should be considered when characterizing neuroinflammation and microglial activation in vitro and in vivo, and when targeting potassium channels.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article