Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcome of Kidney Transplantation From Donor After Cardiac Death: Reanalysis of the US Mycophenolic Renal Transplant Registry.
Zhu, D; McCague, K; Lin, W; Rong, R; Xu, M; Chan, L; Zhu, T.
Afiliação
  • Zhu D; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Shanghai, China.
  • McCague K; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
  • Lin W; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Beijing, China.
  • Rong R; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Shanghai, China; Department of Transfusion, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Xu M; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Shanghai, China.
  • Chan L; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Zhu T; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: tyzhu_dr@163.com.
Transplant Proc ; 50(5): 1258-1263, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880344
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Kidney transplantation is limited by the shortage of donor kidneys. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been explored to alleviate this problem. To better understand the outcome of DCD kidney transplantation, we reanalyzed the Mycophenolic Renal Transplant (MORE) Registry.

METHODS:

We compared delayed graft function (DGF), biopsy-proved acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, and patient death between DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) kidney transplantations. Recipients were further stratified into depleting and nondepleting induction groups for exploratory analysis.

RESULTS:

There were 548 patients who received kidney transplants from deceased donor in the MORE Registry. Among them, 133 received grafts from DCD donors and 415 received from DBD donors. The incidence of DGF was 29.4% and 23.5% in the DCD group and the DBD group, respectively (P = .1812), and the incidence of BPAR at 12 months was 9.0% and 9.9% respectively (P = .7713). The 1-year graft loss rate in the DCD group was higher than that in the DBD group (7.5% vs 3.1%, P = .0283), and the 4-year graft loss rate and patient death rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The DCD kidney transplant group had acceptable short-term outcomes and good long-term outcomes as compared with the DBD kidney transplant group.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Função Retardada do Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Função Retardada do Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article