Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Technical complications following implant-supported restorative therapy performed in Sweden.
Karlsson, Karolina; Derks, Jan; Håkansson, Jan; Wennström, Jan L; Molin Thorén, Margareta; Petzold, Max; Berglundh, Tord.
Afiliação
  • Karlsson K; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Derks J; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Håkansson J; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Wennström JL; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Molin Thorén M; Department of Odontology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Petzold M; Health Metrics, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Berglundh T; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 29(6): 603-611, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923628
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy. MATERIAL & METHODS: The occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy over a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years were assessed based on documentation in files from 2,666 patients. Risk indicators were identified by the use of survival models, considering repeated events. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) including 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Technical complications occurred in 24.8% of the patients. Chipping and loss of retention were the most common, affecting 11.0% and 7.9% of supraconstructions, respectively, while implant-related complications (e.g., implant fracture) were rare. More than 50% of the affected patients experienced technical complications more than once and almost all reported complications led to interventions by a dental professional. The extent of the supraconstruction was the strongest risk indicator for both chipping (HR < 0.2) and loss of retention (HR > 3). CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period, technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy occurred frequently and their management required professional intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Restauração Dentária Permanente Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Restauração Dentária Permanente Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article