Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand-positron-emission Tomography: Still Just the Tip of the Iceberg.
Dundee, Philip; Gross, Tobias; Moran, Diarmaid; Ryan, Andrew; Ballok, Zita; Peters, Justin; Costello, Anthony J.
Afiliação
  • Dundee P; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Gross T; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, University of Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: tobiasgross@gmx.ch.
  • Moran D; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ryan A; Tissupath, Mount Waverly, Australia.
  • Ballok Z; Bridge Road Imaging, Richmond, Australia.
  • Peters J; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Costello AJ; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Urology ; 120: 187-191, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964126
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the performance of Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand-positron-emission tomography (Ga-PSMA PET) for positive lymph nodes on imaging after curatively intended radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Seventeen patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy undergoing robot-assisted salvage lymphadenectomy for positive lymph nodes on imaging were included in this single surgeon study. The performance of Ga-PSMA PET was assessed on per patient, per lesion, per landing site and per laterality level using sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 34 positive nodes were detected on Ga-PSMA PET with a median of 2 nodes per patient (IQR 1-3 nodes per patient). Sixty six nodes were pathologically disease positive from 14 patients, with a median of 2 positive nodes per patient (IQR 1-6). Three patients had no pathologically detectable disease. On a per patient basis, the positive predictive value was 82%. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were not able to be calculated as all patients had disease recurrence with a detectable prostate-specific antigen.On a "per lesion" basis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 36.7%, 96.9%, 73.5%, and 86.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Our study indicates that sensitivity of Ga-PSMA PET in the salvage setting is not yet sufficient to detect all sites of metastasis. Therefore, imaging-guided metastasis targeted treatment is likely to fail given the likely concomitant imaging negative more widespread disease.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antígeno Prostático Específico / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Radioisótopos de Gálio / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antígeno Prostático Específico / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Radioisótopos de Gálio / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article