Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Cardiac Lead Perforation: Comparison Among Chest Radiography, Transthoracic Echocardiography and Electrocardiography-gated Contrast-enhanced Cardiac CT.
Zhang, Xiang; Zheng, Chushan; Wang, Peiwei; Wang, Dongye; Huang, Boshui; Li, Guozhao; Hu, Huijun; Yang, Zehong; Duan, Xiaohui; Zheng, Shaoxin; Liu, Pinming; Wang, Jingfeng; Shen, Jun.
Afiliação
  • Zhang X; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Zheng C; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang P; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang D; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Huang B; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Li G; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Electrocardio Physiology and Arrhythmia, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Hu H; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang Z; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Duan X; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Zheng S; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu P; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang J; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
  • Shen J; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Electrocardio Physiology and Arrhythmia, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Eur Radiol ; 29(2): 963-974, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30019144
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Cardiac lead perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening event. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performances of chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT in the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.

METHODS:

This retrospective study was approved by the ethics review board of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital at Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China), and the need to obtain informed consent was waived. Between May 2010 and Oct 2017, 52 patients were clinically suspected to have a cardiac lead perforation and received chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. Among them, 13 patients were identified as having cardiac lead perforation. The diagnostic performances of these three modalities were evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves using a composite reference standard of surgical and electrophysiological results and clinical follow-up. The areas under ROCs (AUROCs) were compared with the McNemar test.

RESULTS:

The accuracies of chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation were 73.1%, 82.7% and 98.1%, respectively. ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT had a higher AUROC than chest radiography (p < 0.001) and TTE (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is superior to both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation. KEY POINTS • ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT has an accuracy of 98.1% in the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation. • The AUROC of ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is higher than those of chest radiography and TTE imaging. • ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging has better diagnostic performance than both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos Penetrantes / Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca / Traumatismos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos Penetrantes / Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca / Traumatismos Cardíacos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article