Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ladlow, Peter; Coppack, Russell J; Dharm-Datta, Shreshth; Conway, Dean; Sellon, Edward; Patterson, Stephen D; Bennett, Alexander N.
Afiliação
  • Ladlow P; Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Headley Court, Epsom, United Kingdom.
  • Coppack RJ; Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • Dharm-Datta S; Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Headley Court, Epsom, United Kingdom.
  • Conway D; Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • Sellon E; Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Headley Court, Epsom, United Kingdom.
  • Patterson SD; Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Headley Court, Epsom, United Kingdom.
  • Bennett AN; Imaging Department, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Physiol ; 9: 1269, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246795
ABSTRACT

Background:

There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study

design:

A single-blind randomized controlled study.

Methods:

Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT).

Results:

A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study.

Conclusion:

Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration ISRCTN Reference ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article