Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing, Dong; Lv, Yongbin; Sun, Bolin; Xie, Haizhu; Dong, Jianjun; Hao, Cuijuan; Chen, Qianqian; Chi, Xiaoxiao.
Afiliação
  • Xing D; From the Department of Radiology and.
  • Lv Y; From the Department of Radiology and.
  • Sun B; Interventional Therapy Ward, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital.
  • Xie H; From the Department of Radiology and.
  • Dong J; From the Department of Radiology and.
  • Hao C; From the Department of Radiology and.
  • Chen Q; The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
  • Chi X; From the Department of Radiology and.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 43(2): 245-251, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531546
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value between contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast disease.

METHODS:

Two hundred thirty-five patients who were suspected of having breast abnormalities by clinical examination or mammography underwent CESM and MRI examination. Using histopathologic results as the criterion standard, the diagnostic performance of CESM and MRI was investigated. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to analyze diagnostic efficiency. The Pearson correlation coefficients between CESM versus pathology and MRI versus pathology were calculated.

RESULTS:

Two hundred sixty-three breast lesions were found in 235 patients, in which 177 were malignant and 86 were benign. By evaluating the diagnostic value, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and false-negative rate from CESM examination were comparable to those from MRI (91.5%, 94.7%, 83.7%, and 8.5% vs 91.5%, 90.5%, 82.1%, and 8.5%). Importantly, the accuracy and the specificity were higher for CESM than those for MRI (81% and 89.5% vs 80.2% and 71.7%), whereas the false-positive rate was lower (10.5% vs 19.8%). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of CESM and MRI were 0.950 and 0.939, displaying the equivalent diagnostic efficiency (P = 0.48).For the agreement between measurements, mean tumor sizes were 3.1 cm for CESM and 3.4 cm for MRI compared with 3.2 cm on histopathologic results. The Pearson correlation coefficient of CESM versus histopathology (r = 0.774, P = 0.000) was consistent with MRI versus histopathology (r = 0.771, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results show better accuracy, specificity, and false-positive rate of CESM in breast cancer detection than MRI. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography displayed a good correlation with histopathology in assessing the lesion size of breast cancer, which is consistent with MRI.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Comput Assist Tomogr Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Comput Assist Tomogr Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article