Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of comorbidity on therapeutic decision making and impact on outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancers: Results from a prospective cohort study.
Agarwal, JaiPrakash; Adulkar, Deepanjali; Swain, Monali; Chakraborty, Santam; Gupta, Tejpal; Budrukkar, Ashwini; Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani; Murthy, Vedang.
Afiliação
  • Agarwal J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Adulkar D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Swain M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Chakraborty S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Gupta T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Budrukkar A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Ghosh-Laskar S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Murthy V; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Head Neck ; 41(3): 765-773, 2019 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30552822
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High prevalence of comorbidity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) often lead to suboptimal treatment. The presence study aims to evaluate the presence of comorbidity, its impact on therapeutic decision making, treatment compliance, and overall survival in HNSCC.

METHODS:

Five hundred eighteen patients with nonmetastatic HNSCC, elder than 18 years of age, without any prior history of cancer or anticancer treatment in the last 5 years were evaluated using Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE 27) index.

RESULTS:

Two hundred ninety three (56.6%) patients had comorbidity, and 20.6% had deviation from the ideal treatment plan. Higher grade of comorbidity led to less likely completion of guideline-concordant therapy (moderate ACE 27 vs none odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82, P < .01*; severe ACE 27 vs none OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.57, P < .01*). Patients who completed guideline-concordant treatment had the best outcomes as compared to those who could not (median survival not reached vs 9.56 months, hazard ratio 3.66, 95% CI 2.8-4.79; P < .01*).

CONCLUSION:

Presence of increasing severity of comorbidity in HNSCC influences therapeutic decision making. Survival outcomes are poorer in patients receiving guideline-discordant treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article