Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Debunking a Surgical Myth: Do Not Touch the Temporalis.
Bennett, Katelyn G; Ettinger, Russell E; Liang, Fan; Beck, Peter C C; Stoldt, Meike K; McNeely, Molly M; Nabi, Syed R; Vercler, Christian J; Buchman, Steven R.
Afiliação
  • Bennett KG; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan.
  • Ettinger RE; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan.
  • Liang F; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center.
  • Beck PCC; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Stoldt MK; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • McNeely MM; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Nabi SR; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Vercler CJ; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan.
  • Buchman SR; Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(2): 429-432, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640849
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A longstanding dictum exists to avoid surgical manipulation of the temporalis muscle out of concern for an exceedingly high rate of muscle atrophy and recurrent temporal hollowing. The authors challenge this surgical myth, considering such advice to be erroneous. The authors hypothesize that elevation of the temporalis muscle, if performed using standard muscle flap principles, will demonstrate excellent results.

METHODS:

To assess temporalis response to surgical manipulation, the authors reviewed patients who underwent calvarial vault remodeling by the senior author for craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011. Nonsyndromic patients with single-suture synostosis and 5 years of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. The medical record was used to measure rates of reoperation, recurrent temporal hollowing, and persistent temporalis overcorrection.

RESULTS:

Of the cohort reviewed, 196 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients (5.1%) exhibited recurrent bitemporal constriction. One patient (0.5%) underwent a revision temporalis turnover flap, and 2 patients (1.0%) underwent soft tissue augmentation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%. Temporalis overcorrection, in an attempt to prophylactically rectify the expected atrophy after temporalis manipulation, persisted in 11 patients (5.6%). Three of these patients required treatment with steroid injections, Botox injections, or operative muscle debulking. The overall reoperation rate for temporalis overcorrection was 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors' low reoperation rates for recurrent deformity, in combination with persistent temporalis overcorrection in 5.6% of patients, should dispel the myth that manipulation of the temporalis invariably results in atrophy. The muscle may be surgically manipulated, as long as plastic surgery principles are followed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Músculo Temporal / Atrofia Muscular / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Craniossinostoses Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Músculo Temporal / Atrofia Muscular / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Craniossinostoses Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article