Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments.
de Araújo Nobre, Miguel; Salvado, Francisco; Nogueira, Paulo; Rocha, Evangelista; Ilg, Peter; Maló, Paulo.
Afiliação
  • de Araújo Nobre M; University Clinic of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal. mignobre@gmail.com.
  • Salvado F; Research and Development Department, Maló Clinic, 1600-042 Lisbon, Portugal. mignobre@gmail.com.
  • Nogueira P; University Clinic of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal. fjsalvado2002@yahoo.com.
  • Rocha E; Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. pnogueira16@gmail.com.
  • Ilg P; Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. evangelistarocha@hotmail.com.
  • Maló P; Oromaxillofacial Surgery, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brasil. jpilg@uol.com.br.
J Clin Med ; 8(2)2019 Feb 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30781553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort.

METHODS:

Three hundred and fifty-three patients with 1238 implants were observed. A risk score was calculated from eight predictors and risk groups were established. Relative risk (RR) was estimated using logistic regression, and the c-statistic was calculated. The effect/impact of the recall regimen (≤ six months; > six months) on the incidence of peri-implant disease was evaluated for a subset of cases and matched controls. The RR and the proportional attributable risk (PAR) were estimated.

RESULTS:

At baseline, patients fell into the following risk profiles low-risk (n = 102, 28.9%), moderate-risk (n = 68, 19.3%), high-risk (n = 77, 21.8%), and very high-risk (n = 106, 30%). The incidence of peri-implant disease over five years was 24.1% (n = 85 patients). The RR for the risk groups was 5.52 (c-statistic = 0.858). The RR for a longer recall regimen was 1.06, corresponding to a PAR of 5.87%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The risk score for estimating peri-implant disease was validated and showed very good performance. Maintenance appointments of < six months or > six months did not influence the incidence of peri-implant disease when considering the matching of cases and controls by risk profile.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article