Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fingerstick Precision and Total Error of a Point-of-Care HbA1c Test.
Arnold, William D; Kupfer, Kenneth; Hvidsten Swensen, Monica; Fortner, Kyle S; Bays, Harold E; Davis, Mathew; Klaff, Leslie J; San George, Richard C.
Afiliação
  • Arnold WD; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, a division of Abbott Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Kupfer K; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, a division of Abbott Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Hvidsten Swensen M; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, a division of Abbott Laboratories, Oslo, Norway.
  • Fortner KS; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, a division of Abbott Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Bays HE; L-MARC Research Center, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Davis M; Rochester Clinical Research, Inc, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Klaff LJ; Rainier Clinical Research Center, Inc, Renton, WA, USA.
  • San George RC; Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, a division of Abbott Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 14(5): 890-895, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30841743
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Point-of-care (POC) HbA1c tests hold the promise of reducing the rates of undiagnosed diabetes, provided they exhibit acceptable analytical performance. The precision and total error of the POC (Afinion™ HbA1c Dx) test were investigated using whole blood samples obtained by fingerstick and venipuncture.

METHODS:

Fingerstick samples spanning the assay range were collected from 61 subjects at three representative POC sites. At each site, six fingerstick samples were obtained from each subject and tested on the POC test across two (Afinion AS100) instruments. Repeatability, between-operator, and between-instrument components of variance were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Four venous samples (low, threshold, medium, and high HbA1c) were measured in duplicate across three instruments using three reagent lots, twice per day over 20-days. Repeatability, between-run, between-day, between-lot, and between-instrument components of variance were calculated. These fingerstick and venous blood results, combined with estimates of imprecision and bias from a prior investigation, allowed for the calculation of the total coefficient of variation (CV) and total error of the POC test using fingerstick and venous whole blood samples.

RESULTS:

The total imprecision ranged from 1.30% to 2.03% CV using fingerstick samples and from 1.31% to 1.64% CV using venous samples. The total error ranged from 2.87% to 4.75% using fingerstick samples and from 2.93% to 3.80% using venous samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

The POC test evaluated here is precise across its measuring range using both fingerstick and venous whole blood. The calculated total error of the test is well under the accepted quality requirement of ≤6%.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Química do Sangue / Hemoglobinas Glicadas / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Diabetes Mellitus / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Química do Sangue / Hemoglobinas Glicadas / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Diabetes Mellitus / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article