Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing quality and resources during campus-wide simulation integration.
Weis, Joshua J; Hogg, Deborah C; Sulistio, Melanie; Farr, Deborah E; Ginsburg, Charles; Guttman, Oren T; Krumwiede, Kim Hoggatt; Kho, Kimberly A; Martinez, Joseph; Reed, Gary; Rege, Robert V; Thiele, Dwain; Wagner, James M; Scott, Daniel J.
Afiliação
  • Weis JJ; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: Weis.josh@gmail.com.
  • Hogg DC; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Sulistio M; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Farr DE; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Ginsburg C; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Guttman OT; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Krumwiede KH; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Kho KA; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Martinez J; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Reed G; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Rege RV; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Thiele D; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Wagner JM; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Scott DJ; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Am J Surg ; 219(1): 33-37, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898304
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Our simulation center, supported by four departments (Surgery, OB/GYN, Urology, and Anesthesiology), is accredited as a comprehensive Accredited Educational Institute (AEI) and is now expanding to accommodate all departments on campus.

METHODS:

A 61-point questionnaire was administered to 44 stakeholders, representing all of UME and GME. Data were compared for AEI vs. non-AEI activities.

RESULTS:

Responses were collected from all 44 groups (100% response rate). Overall, 43 simulation activities were hosted within the AEI and 40 were hosted by non-AEI stakeholders. AEI activities were more likely to be mandatory (93% vs. 75%, p = 0.02), have written learning objectives (79% vs 43%, p < 0.001), and use validated assessment metrics (33% vs. 13%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

These data suggest that the AEI courses are more robust in terms of structured learning and assessment compared to non-AEI courses. Campus-wide application of uniform quality standards is anticipated to require significant faculty, course, and program development.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Academias e Institutos / Treinamento por Simulação / Recursos em Saúde / Acreditação / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Academias e Institutos / Treinamento por Simulação / Recursos em Saúde / Acreditação / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article