Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left ventricular lead misplacement discovered a decade after cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation: a case report.
Leung, Lisa W M; Evranos, Banu; Narain, Rajay; Gallagher, Mark M.
Afiliação
  • Leung LWM; Cardiology Department, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Evranos B; Cardiology Department, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Narain R; Cardiology Department, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Gallagher MM; Cardiology Department, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 2(2): yty071, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31020148
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Satisfactory left ventricular (LV) lead placement into the coronary sinus (CS) can be achieved in the majority of patients but there are still instances of acute failure most often due to anatomical differences, for example due to tortuous CS anatomy. Chronic LV lead misplacement and its delayed discovery is not a common scenario. It is unclear if chronic dual right ventricular pacing can hasten the progression of heart failure. CASE PRESENTATION A 73-year-old lady presented to our cardiac centre with severe heart failure. She had non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with underlying left bundle branch block and a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator device in situ for the past decade. She also had a chronic pericardial effusion of unknown aetiology. Whilst the patient was being treated for acute heart failure, it was noted on patient telemetry that the QRS morphology for supposed bi-ventricular pacing was unusual. This led to a lateral chest radiograph and a CS venogram to be performed, both of which confirmed that the LV lead was in fact not in the CS. Plans were made to place a new LV lead but unfortunately the patient continued to clinically deteriorate despite maximal treatment and died before this could be performed.

DISCUSSION:

It is only with thorough review of the electrocardiographic data and chest radiography that led to the discovery of chronic LV lead misplacement. This case illustrates the importance of expert review of radiographic imaging and electrocardiographic data in patients with implanted cardiac devices.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Case Rep Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Case Rep Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article