Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parasite survey on a captive wolf population using classical techniques and ELISA coproantigen detection, USA.
Balinsky, David L; Paras, Kelsey L; Hanna, Rita; Elsemore, David A; Verocai, Guilherme G.
Afiliação
  • Balinsky DL; Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 501 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
  • Paras KL; Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 501 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
  • Hanna R; IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USA.
  • Elsemore DA; IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME 04092, USA.
  • Verocai GG; Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 501 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Electronic address: gverocai@cvm.tamu.edu.
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports ; 16: 100285, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31027601
ABSTRACT
As laws change around the United States, wildlife that were once kept as companion animals are now often confiscated by local authorities. They are then euthanized unless a home is found for them at a sanctuary. Wolf sanctuaries are, therefore, becoming increasingly important for their conservation and management. However, little data is available on best practices for the health management of captive wolves, including data on parasitic diseases. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of parasites of captive wolves combining classical coprological techniques and immunoassays based on the detection of coproantigen of selected canid parasites. Fecal samples of 39 animals were collected upon observation of individual animals defecating. All samples were processed using the Fecal Dx® tests, a suite of coproantigen ELISAs for detection of ascarid, hookworm, whipworm, and Giardia (IDEXX Laboratories Inc.). Out of the 39 samples, 38 were processed using the double-centrifugation sugar flotation (DCSF) and 34 using a modification of the Baermann technique. Twenty-eight samples (71.8%) were positive for hookworm, and none positive for the other parasites tested using coproantigen ELISA. Ancylostoma sp. (26, 68.4%), Eucoleus boehmi (13, 34.2%), and Trichuris sp. (2; 5.3%), and Sarcocystis sp. (13, 34.2%) were detected using DCSF. No metastrongyloid lungworm larvae were found. The Cohen's kappa index (0.97) showed excellent agreement between the hookworm coproantigen ELISA and the DCSF using feces preserved in ethanol for a short period of time. This study provides a baseline on the parasites of captive wolves, and shows that recent innovative diagnostics in veterinary parasitology, developed and optimized for dogs, may be used for assessing the health of wolves.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Protozoárias em Animais / Lobos / Fezes / Helmintíase Animal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Protozoárias em Animais / Lobos / Fezes / Helmintíase Animal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article