Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Personality Trait Predictive Utility and Stability in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Major Depression: Dissociation of Neuroticism and Self-Criticism.
Kopala-Sibley, Daniel C; Chartier, Gabrielle B; Bhanot, Shiv; Cole, Jaeden; Chan, Peter Y; Berlim, Marcelo T; McGirr, Alexander.
Afiliação
  • Kopala-Sibley DC; Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Chartier GB; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Bhanot S; Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Cole J; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Chan PY; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Berlim MT; Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • McGirr A; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry ; 65(4): 264-272, 2020 04.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043062
BACKGROUND: Cost-efficient and non-invasive predictors of antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are required. The personality vulnerabilities­neuroticism and self-criticism­are associated with antidepressant outcomes in other modalities; however, self-criticism has not been examined in response to rTMS, and the literature on neuroticism and rTMS is inconsistent. METHODS: This naturalistic, 4-week study involved daily dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC) rTMS for major depression (15 unipolar, 2 bipolar). Participants completed the Big Five Inventory (neuroticism) and the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (self-criticism) at baseline and at the end of treatment. Changes in depressive symptoms, as rated by the clinician, were quantified using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Given the inconsistencies in data regarding the stability of neuroticism in patients receiving rTMS, we performed a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of trials examining rTMS and neuroticism. RESULTS: rTMS significantly improved depressive symptoms, and this was predicted by higher levels of self-criticism but not neuroticism. Self-criticism was stable over the 4 weeks of rTMS; however, neuroticism decreased, and this was not related to decreases in depressive symptoms. Our quantitative meta-analysis of 4 rTMS trials in major depression (n = 52 patients) revealed decreases in neuroticism, with a moderate effect size. LIMITATIONS: Our results are limited by a small sample size, and the absence of a sham-rTMS group. Our meta-analysis included only 4 trials. CONCLUSION: Highly self-critical patients appear to benefit more from rTMS than less self-critical patients. Neuroticism, a conceptually similar but distinct personality domain, does not appear to predict antidepressant response, yet this vulnerability factor for depression decreases after rTMS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Córtex Pré-Frontal / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Neuroticismo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Fr Revista: Can J Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Córtex Pré-Frontal / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Neuroticismo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Fr Revista: Can J Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article