Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which behaviour change techniques are most effective in improving healthcare utilisation in COPD self-management programmes? A protocol for a systematic review.
Smalley, Katelyn Rene; Aufegger, Lisa; Flott, Kelsey; Holt, Gracie; Mayer, Erik K; Darzi, Ara.
Afiliação
  • Smalley KR; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Aufegger L; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Flott K; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Holt G; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Mayer EK; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Darzi A; Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 6(1): e000369, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31178995
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Self-management interventions are often presented as a way to improve the quality of care for patients with chronic illness. However, self-management is quite broadly defined and it remains unclear which types of interventions are most successful. This review will use the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as a lens through which to categorise self-management interventions regarding which programmes are most likely to be effective and under which circumstances.The aim of this study is to (1) describe the types of self-management programmes that have been developed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and identify the common elements between these to better classify self-management, and (2) evaluate the effect that self-management programmes have on the healthcare behaviour of patients with COPD by classifying those programmes by the behaviour change techniques used. Methods and

analysis:

A systematic search of the literature will be performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC and PsycINFO. This review will be limited to randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. The review will follow PRISMA-P guidelines, and will provide a PRISMA checklist and flowchart. Risk of bias in individual studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria, and the quality of included studies will be evaluated using the GRADE criteria, and will be reported in a Summary of Findings table.The primary analysis will be a catalogue of the interventions based on the components of the TDF that were used in the intervention. A matrix comparing included behaviour change techniques to improvements in utilisation will summarise the primary outcomes. Ethics and dissemination Not applicable, as this is a secondary review of the literature. Prospero registration number CRD42018104753.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Comportamental / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Autogestão / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Comportamental / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica / Autogestão / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article