Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantification of aerobic determinants of performance in post-pubertal adolescent middle-distance runners.
Blagrove, Richard C; Howatson, Glyn; Pedlar, Charles R; Hayes, Philip R.
Afiliação
  • Blagrove RC; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK. R.C.Blagrove@lboro.ac.uk.
  • Howatson G; Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Pedlar CR; Water Research Group, Northwest University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
  • Hayes PR; School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University, Twickenham, UK.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 119(8): 1865-1874, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31209572
PURPOSE: The use of oxygen cost ([Formula: see text]aero) parameters to predict endurance performance has recently been criticized. Instead, it is suggested that aerobic energy cost ([Formula: see text]) provides greater validity; however, a comparison of these quantification methods has not previously been made. METHODS: Fifty-six male (n = 34) and female (n = 22) competitive adolescent (17 ± 1 years) middle-distance runners participated in a sub-maximal and maximal incremental treadmill test. Running economy (RE) was measured at the speed corresponding to lactate turnpoint, and the three speeds prior. Maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2max), speed at [Formula: see text]O2max and fraction of [Formula: see text]O2max utilized across a range of intensities, and speeds from 0.8, 1.5 and 3 km races were also quantified. RE and fractional utilization were calculated in units of [Formula: see text]aero and [Formula: see text]aero. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression models demonstrated no discernible difference in the predictive capability of RE, fractional utilization and [Formula: see text]O2max when expressed as [Formula: see text]aero or [Formula: see text]aero in both sexes. When plotted as a function of running speed, [Formula: see text]aero displayed a stepwise decrease (F = 11.59, p < 0.001) whereas [Formula: see text]aero exhibited a curvilinear response (F = 4.74, p = 0.015). Differences were also evident in the slopes plotted for %[Formula: see text]O2max and %[Formula: see text]aeromax against running speed (F = 5.38, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying aerobic determinants of performance in units of [Formula: see text]aero provides no greater validity compared to [Formula: see text]aero-based measurement. Although both [Formula: see text]aero and [Formula: see text]aero are sensitive to changes in speed, [Formula: see text]aero provides the more valid reflection of the underlying metabolic cost of running. Physiologists should also be aware of the potential differences between expression of aerobic running intensity based upon %[Formula: see text]O2max compared to %[Formula: see text]aeromax.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Corrida / Metabolismo Energético / Desempenho Atlético / Condicionamento Físico Humano Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Appl Physiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Corrida / Metabolismo Energético / Desempenho Atlético / Condicionamento Físico Humano Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Appl Physiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article