Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction or Birth Weight Discordance on Long-Term Neurodevelopment in Monochorionic Twins: A Systematic Literature Review.
Groene, Sophie G; Tollenaar, Lisanne S A; Oepkes, Dick; Lopriore, Enrico; van Klink, Jeanine M M.
Afiliação
  • Groene SG; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. s.g.groene@lumc.nl.
  • Tollenaar LSA; Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Oepkes D; Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Lopriore E; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Klink JMM; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med ; 8(7)2019 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31261823
ABSTRACT
The aim of this review was to assess the impact of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) and/or birth weight discordance (BWD) on long-term neurodevelopment in monochorionic (MC) twins. Five out of 28 articles assessed for eligibility were included. One article concluded that the incidence of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was higher in BWD MC twins (11/26, 42%) than in BWD dichorionic (DC) (5/38, 13%) and concordant MC twins (6/71, 8%). BWD MC twins had a 6-fold higher risk of cerebral palsy compared to DC twins (5/26, 19% vs. 1/40, 3%, p < 0.05). Another article described a linear relationship between birth weight and verbal IQ scores, demonstrating a 13-point difference for a 1000 gram BWD between the twins, with a disadvantage for the smaller twin (p < 0.0001). Three articles analyzing within-pair differences showed that the smaller twin more frequently demonstrated mild NDI (6/80, 8% vs. 1/111, 1%) and lower developmental test scores (up to 5.3 points) as opposed to its larger co-twin. Although these results suggest that MC twins with sFGR/BWD are at increased risk of long-term NDI as compared to BWD DC or concordant MC twins, with a within-pair disadvantage for the smaller twin, the overall level of evidence is of moderate quality. As only five articles with a high degree of heterogeneity were available, our review mainly demonstrates the current lack of knowledge of the long-term outcomes of MC twins with sFGR/BWD. Insight into long-term outcomes will lead to improved prognostics, which are essential in parent counseling and crucial in the process of forming a management protocol specifically for twins with sFGR to optimally monitor and support their development.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article